From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zipcode.az.mvista.com (unknown [65.200.49.156]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7BCDDDF6 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:32:55 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:33:38 -0700 From: "Mark A. Greer" To: Scott Wood , paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/19] bootwrapper: Rename p and pp to anchor and anchorptr. Message-ID: <20070313053338.GC27618@mag.az.mvista.com> References: <20070312204150.GH28545@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070313021955.GK29506@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070313021955.GK29506@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 01:19:55PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 02:41:50PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > This makes the meaning of "p" clearer, and increases the visual > > difference between the two to avoid bugs such as the one fixed in > > "Modify *pp, not *p, in ft_shuffle()". > > Hrm. This does increase the visual difference, but honestly the > meaning of "anchor" is not notably more obvious to me than "p". Ditto :)