From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA78DDE0E for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:45:17 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:45:10 -0500 From: Kim Phillips To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] bootwrapper: compatibility layer for old U-Boots (a.k.a. cuImage, cuboot) Message-Id: <20070314114510.3c2db987.kim.phillips@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20070312204204.GQ28545@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <17911.31029.598986.827186@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070314155900.GA10075@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:08:57 -0500 Kumar Gala wrote: > > For example, the majority of 83xx boards don't need cuImage support > (at least I don't think they do) since they only ever existed in arch/ > powerpc. believe it or not, I got an 8323 board last week with u-boot 1.1.3 preinstalled. 83xx need cuimage badly. Kim