From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] fix ps3fb glue allowing a modular build
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:25:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070314182528.GN4095@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0703141907290.28462@pademelon.sonytel.be>
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 07:09:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:30:31AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Maybe not "bool" vs "mbool", but it might be nice to have
> > >
> > > bool FB_PS3
> > > depends strictly on FB
> > >
> > > ie a "depends strictly" refuses to upgrade a bool dependency from "m" to
> > > "y", while a regular depends allows it.
> > >
> > > Or something.. The "depends strictly on X" thing would really be just a
> > > mental shorthand for "depends on (X)=y" (it's actually longer to type, but
> > > I think it's a bit more intuitive, thus "mental shortcut").
> >
> > There's a fun side question, though: what should allmodconfig do? FB=m,
> > FB_PS3=n? Or FB=y, FB_PS3=y?
>
> >From `make help':
> | New config selecting modules when possible
>
> FB can be a module, so FB=m, FB_PS3=n.
>
> It doesn't say anything about things that can't be modules :-)
>
> But I agree the chances of getting a system that doesn't work increase...
No, I realize what kind of behaviour we'll get if we go for dependency on
FB=y. However, if we really introduce a new kconfig primitive, it might
make sense to teach allmodconfig to deal with it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-14 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-14 9:17 [PATCH 13/13] fix ps3fb glue allowing a modular build Al Viro
2007-03-14 9:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-03-14 16:02 ` Al Viro
2007-03-14 16:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-03-14 17:07 ` Al Viro
2007-03-14 17:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-03-14 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-14 17:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-03-14 17:59 ` Al Viro
2007-03-14 18:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-03-14 18:25 ` Al Viro [this message]
2007-03-15 1:17 ` Antonino A. Daplas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070314182528.GN4095@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).