From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8E0DDD0C for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:17:34 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:17:28 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] bootwrapper: compatibility layer for old U-Boots (a.k.a. cuImage, cuboot) Message-ID: <20070315151728.GA20430@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> References: <20070312204204.GQ28545@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <17911.31029.598986.827186@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070314155900.GA10075@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070314233627.GB12573@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070314233627.GB12573@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:36:27AM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:59:00AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > It's copied from asm-ppc/ppcboot.h, which was presumably copied from > > u-boot/ppcboot at some point. It's certainly ugly, but changing it would > > break compatibility (thus negating the point of cuImage). > > Presumably? It would be nice to confirm this and see how much it > actually resembles any current file from u-boot. Oh, it resembles u-boot's include/asm-ppc/u-boot.h a great deal. I just wasn't 100% sure in which direction the copying took place. -Scott