From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:05:15 +1100 From: David Gibson To: Scott Wood , paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] bootwrapper: Add ft_find_device_rel(). Message-ID: <20070316020515.GC6868@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070312204153.GJ28545@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070316020036.GB6868@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070316020036.GB6868@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:00:36PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 02:41:53PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > Add a function to look up a relative, rather than absolute, path > > name. > > Ok, I was dubious for a while, but I'm now convinced of the need for > this one. > > Except, to keep the dt_ops structure simple, I'd prefer to see > relative lookup by the *only* one implemented in the hook methods. > Absolute finddevice can then be implemented as a trivial wrapper > around that. And the hooks are added in a later patch in any case, so: Acked-by: David Gibson -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson