From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ocean.emcraft.com (ocean.emcraft.com [213.221.7.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E7CDDE3F for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:20:07 +1100 (EST) From: Yuri Tikhonov To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc: Add support for bigger page sizes than 4KB on PPC44x Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:23:40 +0300 References: <200703161634.58444.yur@emcraft.com> <200703171441.51276.yur@emcraft.com> <17921.3150.242081.66071@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <17921.3150.242081.66071@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200703211423.40508.yur@emcraft.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Paul, On Wednesday 21 March 2007 13:43, you wrote: > Yuri Tikhonov writes: > > Do you think that replacing one integer option CONFIG_PPC_PAGE_SHIFT > > with three logical options (i.e., CONFIG_PPC_PAGE_SIZE_4K, > > CONFIG_PPC_PAGE_SIZE_16K and CONFIG_PPC_PAGE_SIZE_64K) will be the better > > choice ? > > I think you should use a choice...endchoice construct in Kconfig, > which will result in 2 config options, or 3 if you choose to support > 16k pages. Yes, there will be 3 options. Thank you! Regards, Yuri. > > Paul.