From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:40:32 +1100 From: David Gibson To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove bogus errors from check_chosen. Message-ID: <20070323234032.GE4459@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070322161109.GA20512@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070323033158.GG28006@localhost.localdomain> <20070323150517.GB6060@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <4603F077.9090905@smiths-aerospace.com> <20070323153609.GE6060@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070323153609.GE6060@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:36:09AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 11:21:27AM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote: > > The -q[q[q]] I added cuts down/eliminates the moaning, but you still > > have to -f force the output which doesn't match what Scott is advocating > > if I understand him. > > > > The gcc -Wall is backwards to what we should have, perhaps adding --no* > > options like: > > --nochosen > > --nocpu > > --noarmyboots > > to tell dtc that lonely barefoot blobs are OK. > > There should also be a --no-validate option to turn everything off, if > the user is confident that the tree is right and doesn't want to get > broken by new dtcs that have new error categories (or if the user is > using dtc to compile some other type of tree than an OF-ish device tree). That's what -f is. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson