From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF559DDE24 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:48:04 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070403.184804.35358780.davem@davemloft.net> To: david.lang@digitalinsight.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers. From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20070403.181645.68159458.davem@davemloft.net> <20070404022828.5c9b97f3@the-village.bc.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: David Lang Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 18:07:06 -0700 (PDT) > I've seen machines offering up to 48, what's the magic number that makes you > need to chagne nameing schemes? Yep, excellent point.