Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers.

[Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 04:09:08PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> The availability of the specific chip in question is a red herring in
> my opinion. I do understand that 8250 compatible chips are very common
> and are the most likely serial chips to be used with Linux. However, I
> will point out that the define is TTY_MAJOR, not 8250_MAJOR. It seems
> to me that whoever named it was thinking in more generic terms.

You're reading too much into the name.  It's historical, and the reason
can still be seen in LANANA:

  4 char        TTY devices
                  0 = /dev/tty0         Current virtual console

                  1 = /dev/tty1         First virtual console
                    ...
                 63 = /dev/tty63        63rd virtual console
                 64 = /dev/ttyS0        First UART serial port
                    ...
                255 = /dev/ttyS191      192nd UART serial port

                UART serial ports refer to 8250/16450/16550 series devices.

When the drivers/char/serial.c driver was written, it was in the very
early days of Linux.  I'd guess that the major/minor numbers were similar
to Minix, thereby allowing a minixfs to be used as the initial filesystem
type.

Anyway, as you can see, defining chardev major 4 to be "8250_MAJOR" would
also be a misnomer because it's used for the virtual consoles, and it's
_that_ use for which it (probably) was called TTY_MAJOR.

(Note that in the very early days, this major also got used for PTY
devices.  Since then they've moved to major 2/3 and then we got Unix98
PTY support.)

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of: