From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:56:05 +0900 From: Akinobu Mita To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] cell: prevent alignment interrupt on local store Message-ID: <20070411025605.GB2197@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070410111508.GA2969@localhost.localdomain> <1176240168.8061.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1176240168.8061.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 07:22:48AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 20:15 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote: > > An Alignment interrupt occurs when the instruction is lmw, stmw, lswi, lswx, > > stswi, or stswx, and the operand is in local store. > > > > GCC generated such instructions to handle memcpy() instead of kernel > > defined memcpy() without -mno-string option. > > > > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita > > I would personally prefer building the entire kernel with -mno-string > when cell support is enabled... I'm about to resend the patch which prevent alignment interrupts on LS by using memcpy_fromio() rather than putting a collection of -mno-* options in Makefile. (only -mno-string is not enough to prevent that as Segher said)