From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BA2DDF8B for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:42:45 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070412.144246.26987903.davem@davemloft.net> To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SPARC/64] Remove get_property From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20070403230505.f96ea210.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20070403225059.e735b5e4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403225222.88e92221.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403230505.f96ea210.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:05:05 +1000 > All the usages have been renamed to of_get_property. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell ... > If you take the curent powerpc tree (commit > 1b56c1da9eec35c610fa2168d754ce567615a6ee) and apply all the patches I > sent today (1-6 then 1-17) then merge that with your current for-2.6.22 > tree (commit ab571e3091f055b0f8648822e11ee6413993f899), then you can > apply this. :-) > > I did a test sparc64 allmodconfig build (and it get as far as can be > expected :-)) Yikes, this is getting messy :-) We will have some staging issues during the 2.6.22 merge window. For now why don't I leave this one out of my tree and you can just put it into the powerpc tree which eliminated all of the instances of get_property()? Thanks.