From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Gabriel Paubert Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:31:36 +0200 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] cell: prevent alignment interrupt on local store Message-ID: <20070412083135.GA3104@iram.es> References: <20070410111508.GA2969@localhost.localdomain> <1176240168.8061.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070411025605.GB2197@localhost.localdomain> <1176262253.8061.60.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070412042337.GA21832@aepfle.de> <1176355566.8061.121.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070412063321.GA23118@aepfle.de> <1176359890.8061.131.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1176359890.8061.131.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: Olaf Hering , Arnd Bergmann , Akinobu Mita , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 04:38:10PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 08:33 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 12, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > Gets altivec and stops working on POWER5 ? no deal :-) > > > > If there is a significant performance gain (not only 9%) and if > > -mcpu=$cell does not generate instructions that wont work on other > > altivec capable cpus and if rpm gets a target ppcaltivec.rpm (or > > similar), as separate binary tree can be done. > > -mcpu=cell can possibly generate things that won't run on 970 and 74xx. > There are some new altivec instructions among others... Any pointer to a document describing the differences? Regards, Gabriel