From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:04:31 -0500 To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] selection of CPU optimization Message-ID: <20070412200431.GA9067@lixom.net> References: <20070410111508.GA2969@localhost.localdomain> <200704121501.34311.arnd@arndb.de> <981B07C8-D35B-4581-8FC7-DCA58430A081@kernel.crashing.org> <200704121926.03723.arnd@arndb.de> <04335E0C-3963-4849-BEC7-DC9DF3E3280F@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <04335E0C-3963-4849-BEC7-DC9DF3E3280F@kernel.crashing.org> From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Cc: linuxppc-dev list , cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:17:25PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Apr 12, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >Interestingly, -mcpu=8540 is known to gcc, according to > >gcc-4.0.3 -dumpspecs, but is not listed in the documentation. > >There is also -me500, while -me200 seems to be known only > >to gas but not gcc. > > > >What would be the right options to pass on e200 and on > >pa6t? > > I think leaving it blank is the right thing for e200. > > Olof should know what pa6t needs or what makes sense for it. Thanks for the heads up, I didn't notice the email go by on the list. -m{cpu,tune}=pa6t should do it. -Olof