From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8172FDDEC0 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:08:21 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:08:18 +0200 From: Olaf Hering To: Christian Krafft Subject: Re: [patch] ipmi: check, if default ports are accessible on PPC Message-ID: <20070420180818.GA4568@aepfle.de> References: <1172223703.4695.59.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070223135859.62e19ca8@localhost> <1172295412.16060.8.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070226160917.2c801ec7@localhost> <20070420174821.GA4176@aepfle.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20070420174821.GA4176@aepfle.de> Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , "openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net" , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Apr 20, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, Christian Krafft wrote: > > > ipmi_si_intf tries to access default ports, if no device could > > be found elsewhere. On PPC we have a function to check, > > if these legacy IO ports are accessible. This patch adds > > a check for these ports on PPC. > > This patch fixes a breakage of IPMI module > > on PPC machines without a BMC. > > This patch is a no-op even for IPMI capable systems. I missed the 'return 0;' in pSeries_check_legacy_ioport().