From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Vitaly Bordug <vitb@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCMCIA support for 8xx using platform devices
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:59:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070423075957.GA22811@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070423101427.3a1d4983@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 10:14:27AM +0400, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:49:41 +0200
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 22 April 2007, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> > > This utilizes PCMCIA on mpc885ads and mpc866ads from arch/powerpc.
> > > In the new approach, direct IMMR accesses from within drivers/ were
> > > totally eliminated, that requires hardware_enable,
> > > hardware_disable, voltage_set board-specific functions to be moved
> > > over to BSP code section (arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx in 885 case).
> > > There is just no way to have both arch/ppc and arch/powerpc
> > > approaches to work simultaneously because of that.
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing a key issue here, but what's the point of adding
> > more platform_devices for stuff that is already in the device tree?
> > Shouldn't this be made an of_platform_driver instead so you can
> > use the existing of_device directly?
> >
> Was thinking of it but platform_device is better for migration purposes. Hence,
> assuming somebody would want to have pcmcia working not bothering to add whole arch/powerpc support,
> it can be accomplished quickly.
That's a horrible argument. Please do it properly, and let arch/ppc die
as it should. We shouldn't be adding anything to it anymore anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-23 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-22 19:26 Fw: [PATCH][RFC] PCMCIA support for 8xx using platform devices Vitaly Bordug
2007-04-22 21:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-04-23 6:14 ` Vitaly Bordug
2007-04-23 7:59 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2007-04-23 19:55 ` Vitaly Bordug
2007-04-23 21:12 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-04-23 19:07 ` Fw: " Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070423075957.GA22811@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=vitb@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).