From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E9FDDE48 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:07:46 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:07:48 -0500 To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH] DMA 4GB boundary protection Message-ID: <20070424030748.GA29492@lixom.net> References: <1172872183.5310.145.camel@goblue> <20070303232915.GB8028@lixom.net> <1174511149.5225.135.camel@goblue> <20070322175324.GA21120@lixom.net> <1175026241.1398.23.camel@goblue> <20070328155635.GA14356@lixom.net> <1175105842.1398.43.camel@goblue> <1175124183.32220.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1175175842.1398.54.camel@goblue> <17964.42216.839568.476369@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <17964.42216.839568.476369@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 10:22:00PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Jake, > > It looks like I have applied both the final version of this patch > (569975591c5530fdc9c7a3c45122e5e46f075a74) and the original version > (618d3adc351a24c4c48437c767befb88ca2d199d) that modified > iommu_range_alloc(). > > Should I revert the original version? (Since I didn't see a reply from Jake today): Yes, please do. It's redundant given the better patch that went in later. Thanks, -Olof