From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mo-p07-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.190]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CAF8DDEE2 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:45:29 +1000 (EST) From: Stefan Roese To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Change 440GP platform to ppc440 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:46:04 +0200 References: <20070424000153.GD23995@crusty.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200704240746.05129.sr@denx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras , Roland Dreier List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 24 April 2007 02:12, Roland Dreier wrote: > > > I recall dimly that there was some user-visible difference between the > > > 440GP and the other 440 processors, and that's why we made the > > > platform string different. I don't recall what the difference was. > > FWIW, I've run the same userspace (binaries) on 405GPr, 440GP and > 440SPe without any problems. Not that I'm a 4xx expert by any > stretch, but I don't know of anything special about the 440GP. I don't know of any differences either. So I'm voting to change the platform to ppc440 too. Best regards, Stefan