From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5D5DDF1C for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:28:36 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:28:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070425.162841.90714338.davem@davemloft.net> To: segher@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] Consolidate of_find_property From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <86094f4e887d90dbff1be6d20e5fdd5c@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1177541265.14873.222.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070425.161309.02297897.davem@davemloft.net> <86094f4e887d90dbff1be6d20e5fdd5c@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Segher Boessenkool Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:18:59 +0200 > > Meanwhile any feedback on the idea of pushing all of this > > consolidation and cleanup work through one of our trees > > instead of having all of these difficult dependencies > > between the two? > > Set up a branch in one of the Git repos that is for > this consolidation work only, that both the arch trees > can pull from? The beauty with Git is that this won't > lead to merge problems :-) I rebase my GIT tree as patches very often, and I have many direct dependencies on this work both at the beginning and further along in my tree. So this won't work, that's why I haven't suggested it.