From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com (e3.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e3.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EF9DDF1A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:43:32 +1000 (EST) Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3P0gGkU021435 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:42:16 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l3P1hPZf514968 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:43:25 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3P1hOaE001175 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:43:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:51:23 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Start split out of common open firmware code Message-ID: <20070425015123.GE23995@crusty.rchland.ibm.com> References: <20070403225059.e735b5e4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403225222.88e92221.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403230505.f96ea210.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070403232406.ab9a3c86.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070412141905.6f30efd3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070412153424.bf3957f4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20070424223245.78f4fdfb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1177459397.14873.160.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: Stephen Rothwell , paulus@samba.org, "David S. Miller" , ppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:50:13AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> While I realise your patch is just moving stuff around, > >> can this be fixed please? A missing "#address-cells" > >> property means "two cells", not "inherit from parent". > >> The few platforms with a broken tree should just be > >> fixed (patch the tree in the bootwrapper, or perhaps > >> _do_ use this workaround, but only on the affected > >> platforms). > > > > If you can get me access to all of the old PowerMac or CHRP crap with > > broken device-tree's ... > > No I can't, which is exactly why I cannot fix it myself. > > > Note that I don't think there's much cases of such breakage on the > > field, > > For PowerPC it is mostly the G3 PowerMacs I believe. I have one of those. What exactly do you need from it? I can probably do some testing with it if needs be. josh