From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B52DDF12 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:57:04 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:57:16 -0500 To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2.6.22] pasemi: cpufreq driver Message-ID: <20070426015716.GA22598@lixom.net> References: <20070425204633.GC19781@lixom.net> <200704260147.35878.arnd@arndb.de> <20070425235757.GA20905@lixom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070425235757.GA20905@lixom.net> From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, egor@pasemi.com, paulus@samba.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 06:57:57PM -0500, olof wrote: > 2) See the idle loop interaction: It can go tristate once we have runtime > selection of idle loop, but until then we need it for idle=doze. Grmbl. Looks like I posted a stale patch that actually won't build with PPC_PASEMI_CPUFREQ=n. I'll repost with the correct version. -Olof