From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:47:58 +1000 From: David Gibson To: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: Small fixes for the Ebony device tree Message-ID: <20070515054758.GC6998@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070515020026.GG565@localhost.localdomain> <8492e53122b6e1ba269afd53b48a4968@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <8492e53122b6e1ba269afd53b48a4968@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:11:07AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Just a few more things... > > > plb { > > - device_type = "ibm,plb"; > > compatible = "ibm,plb-440gp", "ibm,plb4"; > > You match on "ibm,plb" though. Well you got one > in three right ;-) Indeed. And I'm still not sure how it's recognizing the plb devices right now... > > + SDRAM0: memory-controller { > > compatible = "ibm,sdram-440gp", "ibm,sdram"; > > "ibm,sdram" is way too generic to ever be usefully > used for device matching. Yeah, I guess this should be ibm,sdram-44x or ibm,sdram-4xx. Better go look up if any 40x chips use a similar sdram controller. > > + SRAM0: sram { > > + compatible = "ibm,sram440gp"; > > You spell this one without a dash, all others with one. Ah, yes, oops... -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson