linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Small fixes for the Ebony device tree
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:46:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705150846.09220.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070515061855.GD6998@localhost.localdomain>

On Tuesday 15 May 2007, David Gibson wrote:
> Anyone have any objection to the following:  each of these controllers
> should have compatible properties listing 3 string, first, a specific
> version for the CPU in question (e.g "ibm,sdram-440gp"), then a string
> based on the type as listed below, finally "ibm,sdram-4xx".
>
> > SDRAM:		all 40x (except for 405EZ)
>
> 	ibm,sdram-40x
>
> > DDR:		440GP, 440GX, 440EP, 440GR
>
> 	ibm,sdram-44x-ddr
>
> > DDR2:		440SP, 440SPe
>
> 	ibm,sdram-44x-ddr2
>
> > DDR2 (Denali):	440EPx, 440GRx
>
> 	ibm,sdram-44x-ddr2denali

Why "ibm,xxx"? Is this for the CPU core? Or for the SDRAM controller core? 
Both are not IBM in this case.

> Seem reasonable?

I forgot the new 405EX which will be equipped with a DDR2 controller (not sure 
right now if it's the Denali or the other core right now). So we should 
probably drop this 40x/44x completely. Does this make sense?

Best regards,
Stefan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-15  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-15  2:00 Small fixes for the Ebony device tree David Gibson
2007-05-15  5:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-15  5:47   ` David Gibson
2007-05-15  6:11     ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-15  6:18       ` David Gibson
2007-05-15  6:28         ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-15  6:34           ` David Gibson
2007-05-15  6:47             ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-15  6:58               ` David Gibson
2007-05-15  7:07                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-16  3:47                   ` David Gibson
2007-05-15  6:46         ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2007-05-15  7:02           ` Segher Boessenkool
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-16  3:48 David Gibson
2007-05-16 13:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-14  4:54 David Gibson
2007-05-14 12:22 ` Josh Boyer
2007-05-14 12:59 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-14 15:09   ` Josh Boyer
2007-05-15  1:17   ` David Gibson
2007-05-15  4:59     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-15  5:46       ` David Gibson
2007-05-16  3:47         ` David Gibson
2007-05-15 18:15 ` Mark A. Greer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705150846.09220.sr@denx.de \
    --to=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).