linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org,
	Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [i2c] [PATCH] Make i2c-mpc driver use i2c_add_numbered_adapter
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:05:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705150905.21559.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <528646bc0705150851pa578a56nc0dc171677748e5a@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Grant Likely wrote:
> 
> Take another look; this is a funny quirk of the driver.  The
> assignment is 'i2c->adap = mpc_ops'; not 'i2c->adap = &mpc_ops'.  And
> in struct mpc_i2c, the field is declared as 'struct i2c_adapter adap',
> not 'struct i2c_adapter *adap'.  The driver instance gets a copy of
> the mpc_ops structure to initialize it, not a pointer to the staticly
> defined structure.  I got bitten by the same thing when I was looking
> at the code.

I see -- you're right.  That "template" idiom is a good one to get
rid of, FWIW ... not only is it confusing, but it also wastes space.

- Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-15 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-14 19:11 [PATCH] Make i2c-mpc driver use i2c_add_numbered_adapter Grant Likely
2007-05-14 19:32 ` Grant Likely
2007-05-15 13:26 ` [i2c] " Jean Delvare
2007-05-15 15:28   ` David Brownell
2007-05-15 15:51     ` Grant Likely
2007-05-15 16:05       ` David Brownell [this message]
2007-05-16 18:25         ` Jean Delvare
2007-05-16 18:38           ` Grant Likely
2007-05-16 19:15     ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705150905.21559.david-b@pacbell.net \
    --to=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=jchapman@katalix.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).