From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kellthuzad.dmz.nerim.net (smtp-dmz-232-tuesday.dmz.nerim.net [195.5.254.232]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FC2DDF1B for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 23:23:43 +1000 (EST) Received: from mallaury.nerim.net (smtp-102-tuesday.noc.nerim.net [62.4.17.102]) by kellthuzad.dmz.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CB81A58B for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 15:23:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:24:28 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: David Brownell Subject: Re: [i2c] [patch/rft 4/4] rtc-ds1307 platform update, powerpc mpc834x_itx and mpc8313_rdb Message-ID: <20070515152428.576ca987@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <200705141149.27858.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <200705140946.41993.david-b@pacbell.net> <528646bc0705141044s244ce3ecyad5096c441134203@mail.gmail.com> <200705141125.59266.david-b@pacbell.net> <200705141149.27858.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:49:27 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > > > @@ -329,7 +330,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform > > > > i2c->adap = mpc_ops; > > > > i2c_set_adapdata(&i2c->adap, i2c); > > > > i2c->adap.dev.parent = &pdev->dev; > > > > - if ((result = i2c_add_adapter(&i2c->adap)) < 0) { > > > > + if ((result = i2c_add_numbered_adapter(&i2c->adap)) < 0) { > > > > printk(KERN_ERR "i2c-mpc - failed to add adapter\n"); > > > > goto fail_add; > > > > } > > > > > > ... > > > > > > I think you need to add this line before the call to i2c_add_numbered_adapter: > > > > > > i2c->adap.nr = pdev->id; > > > > If these chips do have multiple instances of that adapter logic, > > that would be an appropriate change. The only "gotcha" might be > > that some platforms use the "pdev->id = -1" trick when there's > > only a single instance ... that would probably map to zero. > > > > I'll hope that whoever makes all this work will resolve those > > particular questions ... > > Oh, and by the way: patches updating I2C adapter drivers to work > with new-style drivers look to be OK to get into 2.6.22 with just > an Ack from Jean, via the MM tree. (Right, Jean?) Correct. I will happily ack such patches, but I won't be pushing them upstream - unless waiting until 2.6.23 is OK for you. -- Jean Delvare