From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F3FDDED5 for ; Sat, 19 May 2007 06:27:33 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070518.132734.34602464.davem@davemloft.net> To: galak@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: decrementer clockevent driver From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <32E780BE-58B7-4303-AA49-1852C4C7EB50@kernel.crashing.org> References: <464DB800.40702@genesi-usa.com> <1179499713.12981.75.camel@chaos> <32E780BE-58B7-4303-AA49-1852C4C7EB50@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Kumar Gala Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:31:19 -0500 > I asked this earlier, but figured you might have a better insight. > Is their value in having 'drivers' for more than one clock source? > I'd say most (of not all) the PPC SoCs have timers on the system side > that we could provide drivers for, I'm just not sure if that does > anything for anyone. I'm in a similar situation on sparc64, so I'm interested in this as well :-)