From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 00:22:41 -0500 From: Anton Blanchard To: paulus@samba.org Subject: [PATCH] Add missing pmc_type fields in cpu_table Message-ID: <20070519052241.GA510@kryten> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , A number of cpu_table entries were missing the pmc_type field. Add them. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard --- Candidate for stable. Considering the number of places missed, I wonder if it makes sense for the fallback case to be PPC_PMC_IBM. diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c index 9cb24d2..e054409 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ static struct cpu_spec cpu_specs[] = { .icache_bsize = 128, .dcache_bsize = 128, .num_pmcs = 8, + .pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM, .cpu_setup = __setup_cpu_ppc970, .cpu_restore = __restore_cpu_ppc970, .oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/970MP", @@ -251,6 +252,7 @@ static struct cpu_spec cpu_specs[] = { .icache_bsize = 128, .dcache_bsize = 128, .num_pmcs = 8, + .pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM, .cpu_setup = __setup_cpu_ppc970MP, .cpu_restore = __restore_cpu_ppc970, .oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/970MP", @@ -317,6 +320,7 @@ static struct cpu_spec cpu_specs[] = { .icache_bsize = 128, .dcache_bsize = 128, .num_pmcs = 6, + .pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM, .oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power6", .oprofile_type = PPC_OPROFILE_POWER4, .oprofile_mmcra_sihv = POWER6_MMCRA_SIHV, @@ -335,6 +339,7 @@ static struct cpu_spec cpu_specs[] = { .icache_bsize = 128, .dcache_bsize = 128, .num_pmcs = 6, + .pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM, .oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power6", .oprofile_type = PPC_OPROFILE_POWER4, .oprofile_mmcra_sihv = POWER6_MMCRA_SIHV,