From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gra-lx1.iram.es (gra-lx1.iram.es [150.214.224.41]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB0BDDEF0 for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 18:46:58 +1000 (EST) From: Gabriel Paubert Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 10:46:52 +0200 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Porting "prep" from ppc to powerpc. Message-ID: <20070528084652.GA7686@iram.es> References: <200705252238.39819.rob@landley.net> <20070528075507.GA6633@iram.es> <1180340614.19517.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1180340614.19517.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Rob Landley List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 06:23:34PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 09:55 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > > I was thinking of writing a bootwrapper that would > > convert residual data to flat device tree. There > > is a lot of valuable information in the residual data, > > like the interrupt routing (which is correct if you > > can read the spec, which is not what the code in > > arch/ppc did). > > We were wondering the other day how reliable the residual data are... > On the boards I use, they are very good. And there is some information (memory size, tb and cpu freq, etc...) that I'd rather take from the residual data than trying to guess. > David Gibson's been toying with that too already, you should sync with > him. I've not yet started to write anything (finishing a hardware project). Regards, Gabriel