From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F7CDDFF9 for ; Tue, 29 May 2007 21:32:39 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:32:32 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/5] powerpc: Make syscall restart code more common Message-ID: <20070529113232.GA6071@lst.de> References: <20070529064533.CA8C4DDFF8@ozlabs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070529064533.CA8C4DDFF8@ozlabs.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard , ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:45:23PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > +static inline void check_syscall_restart(struct pt_regs *regs, > + struct k_sigaction *ka, > + int has_handler) > +{ I don't think this should be inlined. Just create a new signal.c file, which can grow a lot more common signal code later on aswell.