From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ausmtp06.au.ibm.com (ausmtp06.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ausmtp06.au.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7178CDDEC2 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 11:37:36 +1000 (EST) Received: from sd0109e.au.ibm.com (d23rh905.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.225]) by ausmtp06.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4V1cspB7131354 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 11:38:54 +1000 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.237]) by sd0109e.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l4V1f6QM048054 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 11:41:06 +1000 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l4V1bX4S030024 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 11:37:34 +1000 Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 21:32:02 +1000 From: David Gibson To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Fix problems with Holly's DT representation of ethernet PHYs Message-ID: <20070530113202.GA7714@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070529060541.GG30266@localhost.localdomain> <1180448346.3360.49.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1180466979.3360.69.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1180523835.19517.245.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1180523835.19517.245.camel@localhost.localdomain> Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Paul Mackerras , Alexandre Bounine List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:17:15PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 14:29 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > *shrug* Either way works for me. > > > > We're adding these compatible properties to DTS files and the drivers > > at > > the same time. Unless (until?) there are firmwares for these boards > > that start specifying something else in a real device tree, it really > > doesn't matter much. Not that there's anything wrong with your > > reasoning. Just seems like we're trying really hard to define > > something > > "correctly" when we control what's on both sides :). > > > > I do think Segher is right there... compatible 109 and then 108 That's what I've done in the new patch. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson