From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686F0DE005 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 04:28:27 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:28:03 -0500 From: Kim Phillips To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] CPU selection Kconfig cleanup, take 3 Message-Id: <20070615132803.00e43768.kim.phillips@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20070612163016.253915076@arndb.de> <18032.40447.579128.989284@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, arnd@arndb.de, sfr@canb.auug.org.au List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:33:19 -0500 Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jun 13, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > Most of this series of patches touch 8xxx or 5xxx stuff in one way or > > another, so I'll leave it to Kumar to make the decision about them. > > I'll put in 1/13. > > Arnd, > > I'm a little hesitant to move the embedded ppc's over to > multiplatform quite yet. One feature I wanted was in Kconfig a way > to enforce the selection of at least one choice, as well as being > able to optimize things since we only had one choice selected. > > See the following thread for discussion I had with Sam & Roman on the > subject: > > http://marc.info/?t=117156757000002&r=1&w=2 > FWIW, this patchseries tests ok on 83xx, and I didn't have a problem selecting at least one choice ;) Kim