From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0.towertech.it (mx0.towertech.it [213.215.222.73]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60340DDFA4 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:29:35 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:29:23 +0200 From: Alessandro Zummo To: Mark Zhan Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add the support of ST M48T59 RTC chip in rtc-class driver subsystem Message-ID: <20070619142923.4244b0ec@inspiron> In-Reply-To: <1181657546.3975.25.camel@mark> References: <1181548600.5217.16.camel@mark> <20070611121145.GA11297@iram.es> <1181656776.3975.16.camel@mark> <1181657546.3975.25.camel@mark> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:12:25 +0800 Mark Zhan wrote: > Hi All, > > For the platform data of RTC chip driver, you know, currently we use > different header files to define different driver-specific platform data > structure. For example: linux/m48t86.h, linux/rtc-v3020.h.... > > Could we consider to add a new header file linux/rtc_pd.h to gather them > together, and remove those rtc platform data header files in > include/linux directory? files in linux/ are the ones that are required by other modules of the kernel and it wouldn't be fair to combine all of them. I'd rather add a linux/rtc directory. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it