From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D283BDDE10 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:21:01 +1000 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:20:59 +0200 From: "Gerhard Pircher" In-Reply-To: <1182429406.24740.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20070621132059.25900@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070618185715.321010@gmx.net> <1182429406.24740.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: [RFC] Device tree for new desktop platform in arch/powerpc To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:36:46 +1000 Von: Benjamin Herrenschmidt An: Gerhard Pircher CC: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, list Betreff: Re: [RFC] Device tree for new desktop platform in arch/powerpc > You should have /pci/isa <--- this is the PCI2ISA bridge > > and the ISA devices below that. Best is I send you an example of a CHRP > or pSeries devie-tree with ISA stuff on it tomorrow. Ping me if I > forget. That would help a lot. Thank you! > Haven't looked at your .dts yet but it should be "interrupt-controller", > compatible "chrp,iic" or "i8259", with a #interrupt-cells of 2 and > interrupts following the standard ISA encoding. You probably also want > an interrupt-parent property in the isa bridge node pointing back to the > 8259 so it becomes the default for all ISA devices. What about PCI devices? Wouldn't it better to define the interrupt-parent property in the PCI bus node? Gerhard -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail