From: Marc Leeman <marc.leeman@gmail.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: network load 8245 vs. 8347E
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:13:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070621171340.GS5417@chiana.homelinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070621155616.GR5417@chiana.homelinux.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 574 bytes --]
> Simply the load of the processor. The 8245 is running ppc/2.6.17, the
> 8347e is running powerpc/2.6.21.1.
Sorry, I'm confusing my boards: this particular board with the 8245
processor is running 2.4.34 [1].
so
8245: 2.4.34
8237e: 2.6.21.1
[1] the 2.4 line balanced the load better of multiple streams being
taken in wrt to the 2.6 kernels; this is the reason we stuck with 2.4
for this platform.
--
greetz, marc
He claims to be a human from a planet called Erp.
Aeryn - Premiere
chiana 2.6.18-4-ixp4xx #1 Tue Mar 27 18:01:56 BST 2007 GNU/Linux
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-21 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-21 14:15 network load 8245 vs. 8347E Marc Leeman
2007-06-21 15:33 ` Kumar Gala
2007-06-21 15:56 ` Marc Leeman
2007-06-21 17:13 ` Marc Leeman [this message]
[not found] ` <467ABCDC.8060401@genesi-usa.com>
2007-06-21 18:33 ` Marc Leeman
2007-06-21 18:53 ` Matt Sealey
2007-06-21 19:09 ` Marc Leeman
2007-06-28 18:06 ` 2.4/2.6/ppc/powerpc/8245/8347e Marc Leeman
2007-06-29 14:59 ` 2.4/2.6/ppc/powerpc/8245/8347e Marc Leeman
2007-07-09 15:47 ` 2.4/2.6/ppc/powerpc/8245/8347e Marc Leeman
2007-07-09 19:56 ` 2.4/2.6/ppc/powerpc/8245/8347e Linas Vepstas
2007-07-10 7:55 ` 2.4/2.6/ppc/powerpc/8245/8347e Marc Leeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070621171340.GS5417@chiana.homelinux.org \
--to=marc.leeman@gmail.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox