linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Bordug <vitb@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [CURIOUSITY] When will we stop caring about arch/ppc?
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 01:11:49 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070627011149.14bf9fba@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706261903.41801.arnd@arndb.de>

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:03:41 +0200
Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Tuesday 26 June 2007, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Well the arch/ppc tree is basically frozen already, all Freescale
> > stuff got moved over already as far as I can see, and 4xx has
> > started moving.
> 
> 8xx has been moved over, but last time I tried, it was not possible
> to actually compile that code. Note sure if the arch/ppc version of
> it is in a much better shape though.
> 
8xx should be ok now, yet, we have to be aware that only 2 platforms are in arch/powerpc
and there are plenty in arch/ppc still.

> 82xx seems to be in a similar state to 4xx, with a single platform
> moved over, but most of the code still being arch/ppc only.
> 
The situation is better here - most stuff is very similar to what is done (except sandpoint but that's another story)
and the number of platforms is reasonable.

for the 8xx feild, there is quite a lot of boards...
with all the "specifics", it is nearly impossible to provide robust port without actual HW
(or, heh, the result won't work at all).

> 	Arnd <><
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


-- 
Sincerely, Vitaly

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-26 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-25 18:23 [CURIOUSITY] When will we stop caring about arch/ppc? Mark A. Greer
2007-06-25 18:40 ` Josh Boyer
2007-06-25 19:42   ` Kumar Gala
2007-06-25 20:50     ` Josh Boyer
2007-06-26  7:48       ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-26 13:32         ` Josh Boyer
2007-06-26 13:46           ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-26 13:57             ` Josh Boyer
2007-06-26 17:03             ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-06-26 18:51               ` Kumar Gala
2007-06-26 21:11               ` Vitaly Bordug [this message]
2007-06-26 17:18             ` Mark A. Greer
2007-07-03 18:29               ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070627011149.14bf9fba@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=vitb@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).