From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org (smtp2.linux-foundation.org [207.189.120.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.linux-foundation.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FD7DDF6C for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 04:29:41 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:28:38 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Subject: Re: [PATCH]: PCI Error Recovery: Symbios SCSI device driver Message-Id: <20070705112838.2d8c959b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070702183917.GJ4501@austin.ibm.com> References: <20070702183917.GJ4501@austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, matthew@wil.cx, willy@debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:39:17 -0500 linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) wrote: > > Various PCI bus errors can be signaled by newer PCI controllers. > This patch adds the PCI error recovery callbacks to the Symbios > SCSI device driver. The patch has been tested, and appears to > work well. > yup, this is identical to -mm's pci-error-recovery-symbios-scsi-base-support.patch What is the status of ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc6/2.6.22-rc6-mm1/broken-out/pci-error-recovery-symbios-scsi-first-failure.patch? > > ---- > > Hi, > > This patch has been bouncing around for a long time, and has made > appearences in various -mm trees since 2.6.something-teen. However, > it has never made it into mainline, and I'm starting to get concerned > that it will miss 2.6.23 as well. Well you've sent it a couple of times, and I've sent it in five more times over the past year. Once we were told "awaiting maintainer ack". This situation is fairly stupid. How about we make you the maintainer?