From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F34EDDF1A for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:45:49 +1000 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: ARCH=ppc vs ARCH=powerpc Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:34:14 +0200 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200707090234.14851.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Mark Fortescue List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 06 July 2007, Mark Fortescue wrote: > For me, the requirement is to keep support for the cards indicated in > arch/ppc/config/xxx_defconfig (as I have one that I might what to use with > linux) in the same way as they are supported in ARCH=ppc. The one thing that is holding up the transition to arch/powerpc is lack of people with access to the respective boards. If you have one board that you care about, it would be good if you look into getting it moved over. Tell us if you have problems doing so. It shouldn't be all that hard any more, and if it is, maybe some documentation is missing. > I have just made some tweeks to get ARCH=ppc building for me but I still > need to sort out what is required to get around *** Error: Headers not > exportable for this architecture (ppc). You should simply install the headers with ARCH=powerc, even when the kernel is built with ARCH=ppc. From the user space point of view, there is only one set of headers. Arnd <><