From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kernel.dk (brick.kernel.dk [80.160.20.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "A common name", Issuer "A common name" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC36BDDE3B for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:32:31 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:32:41 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] PS3 Storage Drivers for 2.6.23, take 4 Message-ID: <20070710083241.GV13902@kernel.dk> References: <20070704132212.726923000@pademelon.sonytel.be> <20070710075506.GS13902@kernel.dk> <18067.15564.241168.217875@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <18067.15564.241168.217875@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alessandro Rubini , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Geert Uytterhoeven List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jul 10 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Jens Axboe writes: > > > I have no objections to the block bits, however I feel uneasy merging > > the full patchset unless patch #1 has been acked by the platform person. > > I have the first 3 patches in my queue, so yes I've acked it. It's > probably easiest if the remaining 3 go through my queue once they've > been acked - or if you prefer, you can push #4 via your tree once I've > got Linus to pull my tree. Let me know either way. If you already have the 3 first patches, just slurp up the rest as well. No point in making it more complicated than we have to. -- Jens Axboe