From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org,
Domen Puncer <domen.puncer@telargo.com>,
i2c@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:40:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070710144030.3786cbf3@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40707092322v58bbdad0veb0ee2ec00f125b0@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Grant, hi Domen,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:22:05 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 7/10/07, Domen Puncer <domen.puncer@telargo.com> wrote:
> > Work around a problem reported on:
> > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2005-July/019038.html
> > Without this patch I2C on mpc5200 becomes unusable after a while.
> > Tested on mpc5200 boards by Matthias and me.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen.puncer@telargo.com>
>
> Looks good to me,
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
OK, I will take this patch, but I'd like you to add a comment before
mpc_i2c_fixup() explaining what exactly the problem is and how it is
worked around. Otherwise it's a bit obscure what is going on.
I guess you want this patch in 2.6.23-rc1?
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: work-powerpc.git/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- work-powerpc.git.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> > +++ work-powerpc.git/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> > @@ -74,6 +74,20 @@ static irqreturn_t mpc_i2c_isr(int irq,
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > +static void mpc_i2c_fixup(struct mpc_i2c *i2c)
> > +{
> > + writeccr(i2c, 0);
> > + udelay(30);
> > + writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
> > + udelay(30);
> > + writeccr(i2c, CCR_MSTA | CCR_MTX);
> > + udelay(30);
> > + writeccr(i2c, CCR_MSTA | CCR_MTX | CCR_MEN);
> > + udelay(30);
> > + writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
> > + udelay(30);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int i2c_wait(struct mpc_i2c *i2c, unsigned timeout, int writing)
> > {
> > unsigned long orig_jiffies = jiffies;
> > @@ -153,6 +167,7 @@ static void mpc_i2c_start(struct mpc_i2c
> > static void mpc_i2c_stop(struct mpc_i2c *i2c)
> > {
> > writeccr(i2c, CCR_MEN);
> > + writeccr(i2c, 0);
> > }
> >
> > static int mpc_write(struct mpc_i2c *i2c, int target,
> > @@ -245,6 +260,8 @@ static int mpc_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *
> > }
> > if (time_after(jiffies, orig_jiffies + HZ)) {
> > pr_debug("I2C: timeout\n");
> > + if (readb(i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR) == (CSR_MCF | CSR_MBB | CSR_RXAK))
> > + mpc_i2c_fixup(i2c);
> > return -EIO;
> > }
> > schedule();
> >
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-10 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-09 7:19 [PATCH] i2c-mpc: work around missing-9th-clock-pulse bug Domen Puncer
2007-07-09 15:53 ` Grant Likely
2007-07-10 6:17 ` Domen Puncer
2007-07-10 6:22 ` Grant Likely
2007-07-10 12:40 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2007-07-11 5:49 ` Domen Puncer
2007-07-11 6:03 ` Grant Likely
2007-07-11 6:33 ` Domen Puncer
2007-07-11 11:40 ` Jean Delvare
2007-07-21 0:03 ` [i2c] " Guennadi Liakhovetski
2007-07-24 5:14 ` [PATCH] i2c-mpc: don't disable I2C module on stop condition Domen Puncer
2007-08-08 17:19 ` Jean Delvare
2007-08-08 18:33 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070710144030.3786cbf3@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=domen.puncer@telargo.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).