From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9270EDE095 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:48:56 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:52:56 +0400 From: Vitaly Bordug To: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] mmio ide support for mpc8349-itx target Message-ID: <20070710145256.6ac64e11@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <468FC376.2040405@ru.mvista.com> References: <20070707094852.9473.21013.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070707094900.9473.48577.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <468FC376.2040405@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:46:46 +0400 Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MPC834x_ITX > > Erm, isn't this stuff misplaced? Is this really SoC device? I > remember seeng this in the arch/ppc/ platform code before (in the > internal tree)... The point is to declare methods bsp, as mmio access may effectively vary (having bugs or intentionally) from platform to platform. All-in-one driver approach is nice but might be an issue to handle/maintain. Thanks for looking at it, other notes make sense. -- Sincerely, Vitaly