From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kukmak.uni-mb.si (kukmak.uni-mb.si [164.8.100.3]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD63CDDDF3 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:49:39 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:49:37 +0200 From: Domen Puncer To: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: Tickless Hz/hrtimers/etc. on PowerPC Message-ID: <20070713084936.GC11476@nd47.coderock.org> References: <46951C1A.4080001@genesi-usa.com> <20070712065104.GI4375@moe.telargo.com> <4696369A.2010200@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4696369A.2010200@ru.mvista.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 12/07/07 18:11 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Domen Puncer wrote: > > >>Does anyone have the definitive patchset to enable the tickless hz, > >>some kind of hrtimer and the other related improvements in the > >>PowerPC tree? > > >I use attached patches for tickless. > >Order in which they're applied: > > >PowerPC_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS.patch > > That's my patch which used to have both description and signoff that I'm > not seeing in the attached version... Err, yes, sorry, I don't remember anymore where I picked them, but I'm pretty sure I didn't go delete description and signoff by hand. > > >PowerPC_GENERIC_TIME.linux-2.6.18-rc6_timeofday-arch-ppc_C6.patch > > This one should come first of all, I'd say... > Note that it breaks TOD vsyscalls, so you need my patch that removes > support for those for the time being (i.e. until Tony hopefully fixes this > :-). Also, there was a patch implementing read_persistent_clock() and > getting rid of the code setting xtime in time_init(). Attaching them > both... > > >PowerPC_enable_HRT_and_dynticks_support.patch > > Again looks like my patch with description/signoff missing for whatever > reason... > > >PowerPC_no_hz_fix.patch > > This has nothing to do with CONFIG_NO_HZ per se -- it fixes the > compilation error introduced by John's patch. > > >tickless-enable.patch > > That one doesn't look quite right... That's because I made it ;-) It did the trick of enabling tickless though. Domen