From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBE7DDDF9 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:13:02 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:12:53 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic Message-ID: <20070715091253.GA15790@infradead.org> References: <200707111621.24852.ossthema@de.ibm.com> <20070714.235748.02297780.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070714.235748.02297780.davem@davemloft.net> Cc: tklein@de.ibm.com, themann@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, raisch@de.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, ossthema@de.ibm.com, meder@de.ibm.com, stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:57:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > only request is to make this thing able to handle ipv6 as > well even if no current chips could facilitate that yet. I'm not sure that's a good idea. If current chips can't handle ipv6 lro there is no way to actually test it and the code will surely bitrot.