From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org (smtp2.linux-foundation.org
	[207.189.120.14])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.linux-foundation.org",
	Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK))
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43A8DDF77
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:30:42 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:30:20 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: Powerpc - Include pagemap.h in asm/powerpc/tlb.h
Message-Id: <20070719143020.5e0b7474.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <E7820A72-36A3-4B4D-A497-974409D3EBDE@kernel.crashing.org>
References: <20070714012033.GC31649@Krystal>
	<20070718223034.7388e59f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<D9805F9D-04B0-4422-81F1-958B15482A93@kernel.crashing.org>
	<20070719131348.170443bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<E7820A72-36A3-4B4D-A497-974409D3EBDE@kernel.crashing.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:04:38 -0500
Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> >> Andrew,
> >>
> >> Are you sending this to linus directly or should this go via paul and
> >> me?
> >>
> >
> > I queued it up for Paul.  I can send it over to Linus today if we  
> > have a
> > reason for that.  It's just that I dont understand the patch: does  
> > it fix
> > -mm-only breakage?  Does it fix something which already got fixed,  
> > or what?
> 
> I'm seeing the same breakage in my tree.

Oh, OK.  Let's just merge it.

> > One might think "gee, it's trivial, just slam it in", but these nested
> > includes are often not-trivial and something else can explode as a  
> > result.
> 
> I'll do a git-bisect and see if I can find the patch that causes this  
> breakage so we know what's going on.

eh, don't bother.