From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB54DDE1F for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:29:05 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070721.192904.10298367.davem@davemloft.net> To: ossthema@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200707201741.49290.ossthema@de.ibm.com> References: <200707201741.49290.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: tklein@de.ibm.com, themann@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, raisch@de.ibm.com, meder@de.ibm.com, stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Jan-Bernd Themann Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:41:48 +0200 > Generic LRO patch > > Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann I have no general objections to this patch. However I'd like to see at least one or two uses of these APIs before we put it in, and it sounds as if we have at least two pending and in the works if not ready already, so that shouldn't be an issue. Thanks.