From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E3FDDE9A for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:39:17 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:35:11 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Misbah khan Subject: Re: Kmalloc returns which address Message-ID: <20070723183510.GA29223@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> References: <469B92DC.50609@freescale.com> <11737504.post@talk.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <11737504.post@talk.nabble.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 08:47:47PM -0700, Misbah khan wrote: > yes really it would really generate a machine check... but i guess if you > convert this virt address to physical address using __pa() then pass it to > the ioremap() i guess things will work . What would be the point? All you'd get is another virtual mapping. Is the DMA mapping API that difficult? -Scott