From: "misbah khan" <misbah_khan@engineer.com>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Linuxppc-embedded Digest, Vol 35, Issue 51
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:19:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070724091912.98B0C478077@ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4355 bytes --]
Can you please check the data format . PPC works on BigEndian format.
Please do this and let me know .... --- misbah
----- Original Message -----
From: linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Linuxppc-embedded Digest, Vol 35, Issue 51
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:00:02 +1000
Send Linuxppc-embedded mailing list submissions to
linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
linuxppc-embedded-owner@ozlabs.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Linuxppc-embedded digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Gdbserver syscall clobber (Andreas Schwab)
2. Re: Kmalloc returns which address (Scott Wood)
3. Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8778] New: Ocotea board: kernel reports
access of bad area during boot with DEBUG_SLAB=y (Christoph Lameter)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:19:37 +0200
From: Andreas Schwab
Subject: Re: Gdbserver syscall clobber
To: Bill Gatliff
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Bill Gatliff writes:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 12:59:42PM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>>
>>> Now, I'm a little rusty on PPC asm (I've been doing a lot of ARM
>>> lately), but it looks to me like the kernel is setting bit 0 in
CR0
>>> (oris r10, r10, 0x1000) a.k.a LT, but the user side is looking at
CR0
>>> (bnslr+) bit 3 a.k.a. SO.
Bits are numbered from left to right, thus 0x10000000 is bit 3 of CR0
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra?e 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276
4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:35:11 -0500
From: Scott Wood
Subject: Re: Kmalloc returns which address
To: Misbah khan
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Message-ID: <20070723183510.GA29223@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 08:47:47PM -0700, Misbah khan wrote:
> yes really it would really generate a machine check... but i guess
if you
> convert this virt address to physical address using __pa() then
pass it to
> the ioremap() i guess things will work .
What would be the point? All you'd get is another virtual mapping.
Is the DMA mapping API that difficult?
-Scott
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:34:50 -0700
From: Christoph Lameter
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8778] New: Ocotea board: kernel reports
access of bad area during boot with DEBUG_SLAB=y
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bart.vanassche@gmail.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, "bugme-daemon@kernel-bugs.osdl.org"
, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Message-ID: <20070723133450.3de91b33@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:55:37 -0700
Andrew Morton wrote:
> hm. It should be the case that providing SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN at
> kmem_cache_create() time will override slab-debugging's offsetting
> of the returned addresses.
That is true for SLUB but not in SLAB. SLAB has always ignored
SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN when debugging is on because of the issues
involved
in placing the redzone values etc. Could be fun to fix.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
End of Linuxppc-embedded Digest, Vol 35, Issue 51
*************************************************
--
We've Got Your Name at http://www.mail.com!
Get a FREE E-mail Account Today - Choose From 100+ Domains
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5136 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2007-07-24 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070724091912.98B0C478077@ws1-5.us4.outblaze.com \
--to=misbah_khan@engineer.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox