From: David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com>
To: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use 1TB segments
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:53:34 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070803025334.GB6418@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1186087283.22717.80.camel@farscape.rchland.ibm.com>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:41:23PM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> just a few questions.
[snip]
> > +#define VSID_MULTIPLIER_256M ASM_CONST(200730139) /* 28-bit prime */
>
> > +#define VSID_MULTIPLIER_1T ASM_CONST(12538073) /* 24-bit prime */
>
> Anything special in how this 24-bit prime value was selected? (same
> question could be for the 28-bit prime, though I see that value was
> updated at least once a few years back)
I can't speak to the 24-bit value specifically, but I can speak to the
28-bit one: I did the rewrite of the SLB miss handler to use that
multiplicative hash, and changed the prime value when a bug report
showed problems in the original choice.
Afaict, the value of the prime doesn't matter all that much - in fact
it doesn't strictly even need to be prime, just co-prime to (2^36-1).
Originally, I picked the largest 28-bit prime, on the basis that a
large multiplier should give better scattering/folding.
That turned out to cause problems on some iSeries machines (which
couldn't do 16M pages) - we were filling up hash buckets with the
linear mapping. I figured out that that was because a very large
28-bit number was in the relevant modulus, sort of equivalent to a
small negative number. For a big linear mapping, the hash bucket
selected strided gradually backwards through the table - there were
also differences in the high bits of the hash, but they were lost
because of the limited size of the hash table.
So, I changed the multiplier to the median 28-bit prime, in the hopes
that that would give better hash scattering across as many bits of the
VSID as possible. I don't have much in the way of theoretical
justification for that, but it fixed the iSeries problem and I've
never heard of any regressions, so apparently it's not too bad.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-03 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-01 2:04 [PATCH] Use 1TB segments Paul Mackerras
2007-08-02 20:41 ` Will Schmidt
2007-08-02 22:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-02 23:56 ` Will Schmidt
2007-08-03 2:53 ` David Gibson [this message]
2007-08-06 22:23 ` Jon Tollefson
2007-08-10 3:53 ` Michael Neuling
2007-10-02 18:37 ` Will Schmidt
2007-10-03 2:11 ` Olof Johansson
2007-10-03 3:07 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-10-03 3:27 ` Olof Johansson
2007-10-03 3:13 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-10-03 14:22 ` Will Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070803025334.GB6418@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).