From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Domen Puncer <domen.puncer@telargo.com>
Subject: Re: Generic clk.h wrappers? [Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc clk.h interface for platforms]
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:36:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070803083616.GA14516@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708021632.13982.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:32:13PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:28:07AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > > > It doesn't make any assumption on struct clk, it's just a
> > > > wrapper around functions from clk.h.
> > > > Point of this patch was to abstract exported functions, since
> > > > arch/powerpc/ can support multiple platfroms in one binary.
> > >
> > > So... the thread just ended without any consensus, ACK or whatever.
> > >
> > > Choices I see:
> > > - have EXPORT_SYMBOL for clk.h functions in ie. lib/clock.c and have
> > > every implemenation fill some global struct.
> > > - leave this patch as it is, abstraction only for arch/powerpc/.
>
> That seems the best solution for now, I agree.
I've not been avoiding replying further to this thread in spite, it's
just that I've not had any time what so ever to look at this further.
It's very low priority for me at the moment, so it's getting zero time,
and will continue to be in that state for at least the next month and
a bit. Sorry.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-03 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-11 9:31 [PATCH 0/3] clock (clk.h) framework for mpc52xx Domen Puncer
2007-07-11 9:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc clk.h interface for platforms Domen Puncer
2007-07-11 10:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-11 15:56 ` David Brownell
2007-07-11 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-11 17:02 ` David Brownell
2007-07-11 20:34 ` Russell King
2007-07-11 20:52 ` David Brownell
2007-07-13 9:12 ` Domen Puncer
2007-08-01 7:28 ` Generic clk.h wrappers? [Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc clk.h interface for platforms] Domen Puncer
2007-08-01 12:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-02 23:32 ` David Brownell
2007-08-03 8:36 ` Russell King [this message]
2007-08-06 6:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc clk.h interface for platforms Domen Puncer
2007-09-19 3:47 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-09-19 5:11 ` Domen Puncer
2007-09-20 5:07 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-09-20 14:00 ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] " Domen Puncer
2007-07-11 9:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] mpc52xx clk.h interface Domen Puncer
2007-07-11 9:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] mpc52xx_psc_spi: use clk.h subsystem Domen Puncer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070803083616.GA14516@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=domen.puncer@telargo.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).