linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
	stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.22.y] ieee1394: revert "sbp2: enforce 32bit DMA	mapping"
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:58:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070806115804.GA1734@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B5824B.1000103@s5r6.in-berlin.de>

On Sun, Aug 05, Stefan Richter wrote:

> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >>> If setting 32-bit DMA mask fails on ppc64, that sounds like a problem
> >>> with the DMA implementation on that architecture. There are enough cards
> >>> out there that only support 32-bit DMA that this really needs to work..
> >> Yes, could the PPC folks please have a look at it?  Thanks.
> > 
> > Smells like we may have a bug there. No worries though, all current PPC
> > machines have an iommu that will not give out addresses above 32 bits
> > anyway, but I'll double check what's up.
> > 
> > Do you see something in dmesg when that happens ?
> 
> There was nothing in Olaf's report, except for trouble in sbp2 _after_
> the failure.  http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/1/344  (I don't have a PMac.)

sbp2util_remove_command_orb_pool() does not check for lu->hi being NULL.

dev->dma_mask is NULL too, thats why dma_direct_dma_supported() returns
false, and dma_set_mask() will return -EIO.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-06 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.Qn3Snqoik3hhnxcA6HqjGV0Yzck@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <46B4B3DC.7020609@shaw.ca>
2007-08-04 17:30   ` [PATCH 2.6.22.y] ieee1394: revert "sbp2: enforce 32bit DMA mapping" Stefan Richter
2007-08-05  0:15     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-05  7:54       ` Stefan Richter
2007-08-05 22:04         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-06 13:51           ` Olaf Hering
2007-08-06 21:47             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-06 22:22               ` Stefan Richter
2007-08-06 22:25                 ` Robert Hancock
2007-08-06 22:32                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-06 22:35                     ` Robert Hancock
2007-08-06 22:59                       ` Stefan Richter
2007-08-06 22:48                   ` Stefan Richter
2007-08-07  2:18                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-06 22:29                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-06 11:58         ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2007-08-06 21:43           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-06 22:05             ` [PATCH] powerpc: Fix initialization and usage of dma_mask Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-06 22:30               ` Olaf Hering

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070806115804.GA1734@suse.de \
    --to=olh@suse.de \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).