From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outbound4-fra-R.bigfish.com (outbound-fra.frontbridge.com [62.209.45.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.bigfish.com", Issuer "*.bigfish.com" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41D0DDEBE for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:36:33 +1000 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: [PATCH] Consolidate XILINX_VIRTEX board support Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:36:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200708070124.04748.arnd@arndb.de> From: "Stephen Neuendorffer" To: "Arnd Bergmann" , Message-Id: <20070806233630.95E233B0080@mail28-fra.bigfish.com> List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Wolfgang Reissnegger wrote: > >=20 > > Make support for Xilinx boards more generic, making it easier > > to add new boards. =A0Add initial support for xupv2p and ml410 = boards. >=20 > I really think we shouldn't add stuff to arch/ppc at this point, > it has been deprecated for over two years now. This is a good point... In fact the other patch (although tiny) is more important, since it affects drivers, which should work in arch/powerpc. Thanks for the feedback anyway! On this topic: has anyone tried using the recent Walnut patches for arch/powerpc? I briefly took a look at starting to port the Virtex support to arch/powerpc but I'm a bit lost as to where to start... :) Steve