From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ausmtp04.au.ibm.com (ausmtp04.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ausmtp04.au.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA98DDF37 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:51:36 +1000 (EST) Received: from sd0109e.au.ibm.com (d23rh905.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.225]) by ausmtp04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l773sb3Z061790 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:54:37 +1000 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.244]) by sd0109e.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.4) with ESMTP id l773t5Bm198010 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:55:05 +1000 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l773pWQK021414 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:51:32 +1000 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:04:21 +1000 From: David Gibson To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [patch 10/10] Bamboo zImage wrapper Message-ID: <20070807030421.GA15619@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070803160900.069522000@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> <20070803161711.457497000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070806050011.GC11051@localhost.localdomain> <20070806123901.GA3925@crusty.rchland.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070806123901.GA3925@crusty.rchland.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:39:02AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 03:00:12PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 11:09:10AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > Add a bootwrapper for the AMCC 440EP Bamboo Eval board. This also adds a > > > common fixup_clock function for all 440EP(x) chips. > > > > Ok, you have a separate bamboo.c and treeboot-bamboo.c, like with > > ebony. However here, therer's only one outermost wrapper - > > treeboot-bamboo.c which means there's not really any point to this > > separation. > > Milton already mentioned this the first time I submitted the patch. > > > Do you know if there are Bamboo boards with old u-boot versions, or > > some other bootloader which would make the separation worthwhile > > later? > > Yes, there are. And yes, I plan on submitting the cuboot-bamboo.c > wrapper just as soon as I get a chance to get my board switched back > to u-boot. It's actually pretty trivial to keep both PIBS and > u-boot on a bamboo board, since you can program u-boot into the > flash from PIBS and flip some switches to boot from it. Ok. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson